Literature Review
- mfulk78
- Sep 17
- 3 min read
The Chemical Complexity of Food
Nutrition is often taught in the binary of macro and micro: calories, carbs, vitamins, minerals. But what if this perspective is like reading just the first page of a book and missing the plot? The NEJM recently published an article entitled Chemical Complexity of Food and Implications for Therapeutics. It reveals that our diets contain over 139,000 distinct molecules, a vast molecular universe far beyond the familiar nutrients we’re told matter.
This treasure trove affectionatley coined “nutrition dark matter” (NDM) is more than trivia. These compounds interact with nearly half of the human proteome, our active proteins. In practical terms, what you eat every day sends ripple effects across most of your body’s molecular machinery. What struck me most is that about 2,000 of these molecules are already found in existing medications. Take aspirin whose ancestor lives in willow bark; lovastatin? Red yeast rice. These natural compounds were once food, not pills. That blurs the line between diet and therapeutics and visa versa.
Foods aren’t tidy, single-ingredient packages. A clove of garlic alone may harbor over 6,800 distinguishable molecules, many of which perform delicate, unexplored jobs in our biology. We know that they will bear out this truth as science catches up to nature.
These foods have been shaped by thousands and millions of years of evolution. They have chemical diversity with pleotrophic actions in our cells. By evolving in dynamic ecosystems, the authors counsel us that these "food molecules often provide chemical scaffolds that are optimized for protein building but also have a broad range of structures and features". (Manchetti et. al. 2025)
But complexity creates both wonder and challenge. How do we navigate this maze? The authors suggest marrying AI and network medicine using algorithms to predict molecular targets and map interactome connections. Think of it as Google Maps for molecular nutrition, guiding us from complexity toward understanding. Imagine having a map of foods to eat when a specific disease state or infection shows itself as block in your health trajectory!
This is where nutrition science can evolve from “eat your broccoli because it’s good for you” to tailored diets or nutrition education that espouses that we can “eat this because these molecular signals will promote insulin sensitivity, support immune balance, repair tissues and contribute to disease amelioration.” It’s a shift from preaching food as merely fuel to practicing food as precision medicine.
This isn’t just a research chart for academics and medical professionals only. It’s lighting a path for integrative pediatrics, where we can guide families to eat with intention, not impulse. Where infants with developmental or immune struggles might one day benefit from diets rich in protective polyphenols, mRNA molecular food targets or prebiotic metabolites. And where the pantry becomes not a battleground but a resource for healing.
Where do we, as consumers of food, fall on the continuum of the NDM consumption? Are we the ingestors of a wide variety of plant molecules leading to a host of health benefits? Or, conversely, are we on a monotonic standard western highly processed diet with limited NDM? These are the questions that every parent should ask of themselves and their family.
The NEJM review invites us to reimagine food, not just as meals on a plate, but as medicine written in molecular scripts. As pediatricians, parents, and healers, we must lean into that complexity, not ignore it. Because within it lies the possibility for truly personalized, generational health.
Nature is truly the source of longevity!
Dr. M





Comments